LEAD Paint Law Archives

A federal judge in Brooklyn explained in a court memo released on Wednesday why he rejected a landlord’s attempt to use a child’s Hispanic ethnicity to argue for reduced damages in a lead poisoning case.

Judge Jack B. Weinstein ruled that the attempt violated federal law governing the use of statistical generalizations based on race or ethnicity, and forbid experts on both sides to discuss them.

A lawyer for Mark Kimpson, the landlord, was seeking to reduce the $2 million in damages awarded to the child and his mother after she sued over lead poisoning.

A jury awarded the damages on July 10 after finding that the apartment the family rented from Mr. Kimpson contained lead-based paint that had not been properly removed or contained.

“Posed is the question,” Judge Weinstein wrote, “can statistics based on the ethnicity (in this case, ‘Hispanic’) of a child be relied upon to find a reduced likelihood of his obtaining higher education, resulting in reduced damages in a tort case? The answer is no.”

To contest the damages, Mr. Kimpson’s lawyer, Roger V. Archibold, needed to persuade the court that the boy’s prospects for attending college and earning a degree if he had not had lead poisoning were already low. Mr. Archibold argued that because Hispanics are less likely to attend college, the boy’s chances for doing so were improbable.

In a 52-page memo, Judge Weinstein wrote that he rejected the argument based on a case in which the use of race- and ethnicity-based statistics was found to be in violation of the Constitution’s equal protection and due process clauses.

The memo on Wednesday does not affect the jury verdict, which Mr. Archibold has appealed to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Mr. Archibold said Judge Weinstein had “mischaracterized” the defense’s argument about the child’s ethnicity. Mr. Archibold said he was confronting an expert hired by the plaintiffs whose statements at the trial did not seem to line up with the study he was citing.

“The expert was confronted with the evidence of the study that he quoted,” he said. “He opined that the study gave him these statistics and it did not.”

Judge Weinstein added that Mr. Archibold was required to use specific characteristics of the child and his family, rather than the characterization of the child as a member of a particular ethnic group, in projecting damages. The boy’s father has a bachelor’s degree and his mother has a Master of Fine Arts. Both held responsible income-generating jobs, the family was stable, and the parents were caring, Judge Weinstein said.

“Based upon his specific family background, had the child not been injured, there was a high probability of superior educational attainment and corresponding high earnings,” Judge Weinstein wrote. “Treated by experts as a ‘Hispanic,’ his potential, based on the education and income of ‘average “Hispanics” in the United States,’ was relatively low.”

The boy’s mother, Niki Hernandez-Adams, rented a basement apartment from Mr. Kimpson in an old building at 490 MacDonough Street in Bedford-Stuyvesant, where she lived while pregnant and after the boy turned 1.

During a visit to the pediatrician after his first birthday, the boy was found to have elevated levels of lead in his blood. Ms. Hernandez-Adams claimed in her lawsuit that the lead poisoning had damaged the boy’s central nervous system.

Mr. Archibold argued that Mr. Kimpson had sufficiently contained the hazardous lead-based paint in the apartment. Before the family moved in, the landlord had covered the old paint with new paint and drywall, according to the judge’s memo.

Mr. Archibold blamed the family’s dog for severely scratching the walls and the moldings in the apartment, releasing lead dust. He also claimed that the infant’s cognitive and behavioral difficulties resulted from other medical conditions of his mother during her pregnancy.


Ignorance of the Law is not Your Get Out of Jail Free Card!

An Everett, Washington landlord has been ordered to pay a $21,800 fine after failing to include a lead disclosure in his lease.
The landlord, who manages 26 units located in Bellingham, Washington, repeatedly leased properties to tenants over the course of several years without including the federally-mandated lead disclosures. The EPA brought the charges against him.

“People have the right to know about lead hazards prior to renting or buying a place to live,” said Rick Albright, Director of EPA’s Office of Air, Waste and Toxics in Seattle. “Sellers, landlords and property managers who do not properly notify the people who will live in these homes can face stiff penalties.”

The Disclosure Rule requires landlords, property management companies, real estate agencies, and sellers to inform potential lessees and purchasers of the presence of lead-based paint and lead-based paint hazards in pre-1978 housing. They must also provide the purchaser or lessee with a copy of the Lead Hazard Information Pamphlet, “Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home” before entering into any lease or sales agreement, and keep records showing they have met the federal requirements.

I Could Not Believe It.

Is This Really True?

It Is In The Planning Stages Now

The Federal Transaction Tax!

President Obama’s finance team and Nancy Pelosi are recommending a 1% transaction tax on all financial transactions.

It is true.

The bill is HR-4646 introduced by US Rep Peter deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa.

Their plan is to sneak it in after the November election to keep it under the radar.
See what Nancy has to say about this wonderful idea!  http://tinyurl.com/24dn5ud

It’s only 1%! This is a 1% tax on all transactions to or from any financial institution i.e. Banks, Credit Unions, Mutual funds, Brokers, etc.

Any deposit you make will have a 1% tax charged.

Any withdrawal you make, 1% tax.

Any transfer within your account, a transfer to or from savings and checking, will have a 1% tax charged.

Any ATM transaction, withdrawal or deposit, 1% tax.

If your pay check or your Social Security is direct deposited, 1% tax.

If you carry a check to your bank to deposit, 1% tax.

If you take cash in to deposit, 1% tax.

If you receive any income from a bond or a dividend from stock, 1% tax.

Any Real Estate Transaction, 1% tax.

This is from the man who promised that if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax! Remember, he is completely honest and trustworthy.
Keep your eyes and ears open.

Folks, Nancy says this would be a minimal tax on the people, but 1 percent every time you pay a bill or make a deposit is not minimal. This would no doubt tax investment transactions as well as bank account transactions.

Excerpt from American Debt Relief

Contact Your U.S. Representative AND U.S. Senator Now

Here is the Link for fill-in-the-blank email to Your U.S. Representative





Carl Fischer

How To Get Tax Free Income

For The Rest Of Your Life!

and Even After You Die!

Click Here for Full Video/Article (Members Only)

Breaking News Alert: President Obama will not sign foreclosure measure, says official 
October 7, 2010 1:38:33 PM

Obama won’t sign bill that would affect foreclosure proceedings

Thousands of foreclosures are put on hold
During the housing boom, millions of homeowners got easy access to mortgages. Now, some mortgage lenders and state governments have discovered many mortgage documents were mishandled.

By Jia Lynn Yang and Ariana Eunjung Cha
Washington Post Staff Writers 
Thursday, October 7, 2010; 4:48 PM

Amid growing furor over the legitimacy of foreclosure proceedings, White House officials said Thursday that President Obama will not sign a bill passed by Congress without public debate after critics said the legislation could loosen standards for foreclosure documents.

The bill, named the Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act, would require courts to accept document notarizations made out of state. Its sponsors intended to promote interstate commerce. But homeowner advocates warn the bill could allow lenders to cut even more corners as they seek to evict homeowners.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the president did not believe Congress meant to undermine consumer protections regarding foreclosure challenges. Still, Obama will use a "pocket veto" on the bill, which will effectively kill it.

Democratic leaders on the Hill were scrambling to figure out how the legislation managed to sail through the House and Senate without any objection.
The episode may prove embarrassing for Democrats, who in recent weeks have been calling for federal investigations into flawed paperwork, forged documents and other misconduct in foreclosure proceedings initiated by big lenders.

The House passed the bill in April by a voice vote, meaning there’s no record of who voted for or against the legislation. The Senate passed the bill on Sept. 27, just before recess, without any debate.

Even the bill’s main sponsor, Rep. Robert Aderholt (R-Ala.), was surprised by how quickly the legislation was greenlighted, according to D.J. Jordan, a representative for Aderholt.

Congressional staffers said lawmakers will revisit the bill to add protections for consumers.

Jordan said Aderholt had been working on the issue since April 2005, soon after hearing complaints from a court stenographer in his district that courts in other states were having trouble using documents notarized in Alabama.

"The authors of this bill no doubt had the best of intentions in mind when trying to remove impediments to interstate commerce," said Dan Pfeiffer, White House communications director. "We will work with them and other leaders in Congress to explore the best ways to achieve this goal going forward."

This would be Obama’s second pocket veto. Last December, he killed a short-term resolution that turned out to be unnecessary for extending defense funding.

Obama’s veto comes as the uproar over document processing from lawmakers, law enforcement and union officials and other stakeholders intensified on Thursday, turning the foreclosure mess into a political issue.

National civil rights groups, including the NAACP, National Council of La Raza and the Center for Responsible Lending, joined labor unions Thursday in calling for an immediate national moratorium on foreclosures.

"If we don’t take drastic measures now, we can expect millions of additional foreclosures in the coming years, with a disproportionate number of them involving Latino and African American families," Wade Henderson, president of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, said in a statement.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) also called for a national foreclosure moratorium on Thursday, while Michigan Democratic gubernatorial candidate Virg Bernero stunned an audience in Detroit with a forceful challenge to banks to halt home foreclosures in Michigan. Bernero vowed to withdraw $1 billion in state money from J.P Morgan and Chase banks because they have refused to ease up on foreclosures – an idea that is likely please the United Autoworkers of America, which has also been critical of J.P. Morgan Chase.

As many as 40 state attorneys general are joining together to coordinate investigations into the foreclosure paperwork problem.

Patrick Madigan, the Iowa assistant attorney general who is the chairman of the group, said in an interview that they have begun to call lenders to try to ascertain the scope of the problem. He said companies that have known issues with affidavits should broaden their foreclosure moratoriums beyond the 23 states that require a court to foreclose.

"We intend to fully investigate and get to the bottom of this and find out how many companies have this issue, and for those that do to remedy the situation," Madigan said.

Also on Thursday, Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller called on three large mortgage lenders to freeze foreclosures in the state and said Iowa will take the lead in coordinating with other states investigating allegations of mishandled foreclosures.

He urged other firms with "with anything less than absolute confidence in its internal foreclosure review procedures" to also stop foreclosures.

"There appears to be an emerging pattern of careless and perhaps cavalier attitudes by a growing number of lenders when it came to the seriousness of the foreclosure process," Miller said.

The nation’s banks are also being pressured by investors.

Chris Katopis, executive director of the Washington-based Association of Mortgage Investors, said securities trustees should "audit and review the resulting losses to hold servicers accountable for negligence in maintaining the assets of trusts."

"We are afraid that people’s pensions and retirement savings are being impacted," Katopis said in an interview Thursday. "Investors are deeply concerned about possible documentation inconsistencies related to mortgages. It is vital that trustees promptly address these matters."

Staff writer Scott Wilson contributed to this report.
Read The Entire Article


Amid growing furor over the legitimacy of foreclosure proceedings, a White House official said President Obama will not sign a two-page bill passed by lawmakers without public debate after details emerged that the legislation could loosen standards for foreclosure documents.
For more information, visit washingtonpost.com

NEW Resource Makes Your Life Easier – Both Business and Personal and Best of All, IT IS FREE!

You have got to check out this great resource. I use it in my business and personal stuff.

Click on this link to get yours today for free!


Fire back and let me know…

I’m making a short video to show you exactly how we use this in our business.

Dan, my lead maintenance guy, discovered this and turned it on. I did not have a clue about it or how it worked. Yes, i had heard of it, but did  not understand it. Odds are, you are probably the same..


 July 8, 2010 – A coalition of housing industry groups joined the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) today in announcing plans to file a lawsuit against the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for removing the "opt-out" provision from its Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting rule.

The Lead: Renovation, Repair and Painting rule (LRRP) applies to homes constructed before 1978 when lead paint was banned. Its opt-out provision, which expired July 6, let consumers allow contractors to bypass extra preparation, clean-up and recordkeeping requirements in homes where there were no children under 6 or pregnant women, thus avoiding additional costs.

"Removing the opt-out provision more than doubles the number of homes subject to the regulation," said NAHB Chairman Bob Jones, a home builder and developer in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. "About 79 million homes are affected, even though EPA estimates that only 38 million homes contain lead-based paint. Removing the opt-out provision extends the rule to consumers who need no protection."

The Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association, the National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association and the Window and Door Manufacturers Association joined NAHB in filing the petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

The group will challenge EPA’s action on the grounds that the agency substantially amended its LRRP regulation without any new scientific data and before the regulation was even put into place on April 22, 2010.

"Even under the original rule, the opt-out provision was not available in homes where small children or pregnant women live," Jones said. "That shows that this change provides no additional protection to the people who are most vulnerable to lead-based paint hazards."

Remodelers’ and other contractors’ estimates of the additional costs associated with the lead-safe work practices average about $2,400, but vary according to the size and type of job. For example, a complete window replacement requires the contractor to install thick vinyl sheeting to surround the work area both inside the home and outdoors – with prep time and material costs adding an estimated $60 to $170 for each window.

"Consumers trying to use rebates and incentive programs to make their homes more energy efficient will likely find those savings eaten up by the costs of the rule’s requirements. Worse, these costs may drive many consumers – even those with small children – to seek uncertified remodelers and other contractors. Others will likely choose to do the work themselves – or not do it at all – to save money. That does nothing to protect the population this rule was designed to safeguard," Jones said    

 The New Outrageous Lead Paint Law Has Been CANCELLED… for a while

The NEW Effective Date Is…




 The New EPA Rule for Lead Based Paint

by John Adams, for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The new EPA “RRP rule” affects contractors, property managers and others who disturb known or presumed lead-based paint during renovation. The term renovation covers all activities done for compensation that disturb painted surfaces including most repair, remodeling and maintenance activities, such as window replacement, weatherization and demolition. The RRP rule applies to all renovation work performed in residential houses, apartments and child-occupied facilities such as schools and day-care centers built before 1978. Those affected by the RRP rule should read the complete rule, which is available on EPA’s Web site at:
Training, certification, and work practice requirements in the Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule are effective to any job in progress on April 22, 2010. Pre-renovation education requirements are effective now.
Requirements for Renovation Contractors Include:
Certification and Training Requirements
* Firms must have one or more “Certified Renovators” assigned to jobs where lead-based paint is disturbed. To become certified, a renovator must successfully complete an EPA-approved one-day training course conducted by an EPA-accredited training provider.
* All renovation workers must be trained. Renovation workers can be trained on-the-job by a Certified Renovator to use lead safe work practices, or they can become Certified Renovators themselves. Many firms will choose to hire only Certified Renovators to satisfy this requirement.
* What About Landlords Working in Their Own Property or Property Managers?
Landlords receive rental payments and maintenance personnel in rental property or child-occupied facilities receive wages or salaries derived from rent payments. This is considered compensation under the RRP rule. Therefore, renovation and repair activities performed by landlords or employees of landlords are covered by the rule. Work performed by landlords or their employees in pre-1978 housing and child-occupied facilities must be performed using lead safe work practices, if lead-based paint or presumed lead-based paint is disturbed.
Any landlord who becomes a Certified Renovator is automatically qualified to perform lead-safe repairs, renovations and turn-key jobs on his own property, and can hire non-certified workers to performs tasks under his supervision. Also, as an EPA Certified Renovator, the landlord may be able to avoid or divert liability by showing “good faith” efforts at providing lead-safe housing. In other words, it’s cheap insurance.
* I heard that this rule only applied to Investment Property. Am I missing something?
The EPA Renovate Repair Paint rule taking effect on April 22, 2010 applies to ALL pre-1978 housing in the United States, including private residences, manufactured housing and multi-family dwellings, regardless of ownership. In the original version of the law, there was an exemption for owner-occupant housing, but that exemption has been removed by EPA.
* What about Realtors, Brokers or Salespersons?
Generally, a real estate licensee need not become a Certified Renovator unless he or she want to perform covered renovations on target property. However, obtaining certification can help the licensee in several ways:
1.) Realtors who carry EPA Certified Renovator status will clearly understand when lead-safe work practices are required and when they are exempt. This will allow them to safely discuss proposed renovations or paint jobs prior to listing or making an offer on any home. About half the homes in America are considered target housing. In other words, it’s cheap insurance.
2.) A Realtor who discusses or recommends any repairs or renovations and is not an EPA Certified Renovator may have some liability for any consequences of following that professional advice. Being able to discuss the topic safely will allow the agent to do a better job for his client.
3.) A Realtor who adds the title EPA CERTIFIED RENOVATOR to their list of professional designations will be seen as committed to the safety of both clients and workers, and will be seen as more professional than an agent who is not certified.
4.) A Realtor who simply cashes a check for a contractor from a client could be interpreted to have acted as and an agent in a fiduciary capacity for an illegal transaction, and might bear liability under the EPA Toxic Substances Control Act. 
5.) Particularly on pre-1978 housing, a Realtor who can knowledgeably and safely discuss steps commonly needed to make a house more attractive and saleable will get the listing every time over a competitor who is not an EPA Certified Renovator.
6.) Completing this class as offered by John Adams qualifies you for 7 hours of continuing education credit under the rules of the Georgia Real Estate Commission. No other course in Georgia offers that credit!!
* What about HVAC techs, electricians, plumbers and painters?
If they plan to conduct any work, repairs or renovations in pre-1978 housing, they MUST become EPA Certified Renovators in order to perform any work on target housing. After April 22, 2010, it is a violation of federal law to even OFFER to perform covered work on target housing.
Jobs requiring state licensure, such as contracting, plumbing, electrical or HVAC work will now have to be performed by a Certified Renovator if it is covered by the rule, which is 6 square feet for interior jobs and 20 square feet for exterior jobs on pre-1978 housing. Holding a state license does not exempt anyone from this rule.
* What about hiring a “handy man” to just clean up and paint?
Even a handy-man who only offers to paint a room in target housing is covered by the rule. That’s because typical prep work on a pre-1978 involves scraping, sanding and removal of screws on switch plates and outlet covers. These activities usually cause the job to fall inside the EPA rule on target housing.
* What’s the story on window replacement?
Any window replacement on pre-1978 housing is considered a covered repair. That’s because the friction between the window frame and the track typically generates large concentrations of fine dust, and any attempt to remove those structural elements can create a lead hazard.
* The Bottom Line
The point in all this is that this federal law is coming into effect on Thursday April 22nd, and the easy way to be in compliance is to take the one-day EPA Certified Renovator course for a five year certification. Taking the course will bring you into compliance with the law, demonstrate your commitment to lead-safe handling practices, and equip you to protect yourself, your own family, and the occupants of the homes you work in. 


The New EPA RRP Rule Requirements

The new Federal law called RRP now requires that individuals receive certain information before renovating six square feet or more of painted surfaces in a room for interior projects or more than twenty square feet of painted surfaces for exterior projects in target housing, child care facilities and schools built before 1978. The certified firm must maintain documentation describing how and when notification procedures were accomplished.

For homeowners and tenants, renovators must give both parties the pamphlet titled “Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Provider and Schools” before starting work in their living area(s). The firm must get a signature proving receipt of delivery or document the attempted method(s) and reason(s) when a signature was/could not be obtained. If mailed, the pamphlet must be sent a minimum of 7 days in advance of starting the work and a certificate of mailing is required to document it was mailed. Otherwise, you may deliver the pamphlet anytime before the renovation begins so long as the renovation begins within 60 days of the date that the pamphlet is delivered.

If the work is to be done in a common area of a tenant occupied dwelling, the certified firm must also notify tenants individually and or post signs describing the renovations including how to get a free copy of the pamphlet, the location(s) of the work, the scope of the work and the timing of the work. Any changes must also be communicated to tenants in advance and, again, must be properly documented.

For child care facilities, including preschools and kindergarten classrooms, and the families of children under the age of six that attend those facilities, a variety of considerations apply. Check out Flow Chart #2 on page 8 of the EPA’s Small Entity Compliance Guide for specific details

EPA RRP Work Practices

Once work is ready to start on a pre-1978 renovation, the Certified Renovator has a number of important and required responsibilities:

  1. First, before the work starts, this person will post warning signs outside the work area and perform and/or supervise setting up containment to prevent spreading dust. The rule lists specific minimum containment procedures as well as additional performance guidelines for both interior and exterior projects.
  2. Next, the Certified Renovator will supervise and or train employees to perform the required work practices they are allowed to perform if not certified themselves.
  3. The rule also lists specific requirements for the handling and storage of debris, inside and outside of the work area, as well as transportation of the debris off the site.
  4. The rule forbids certain work practices including open flame or torch burning, use of a heat gun that exceeds 1100°F, and high-speed sanding and grinding unless the tool is equipped with a HEPA exhaust control. Again, the Certified Renovator is responsible to ensure that these practices are not used at the jobsite.
  5. Once the work is completed, the regulation specifies cleaning and waste disposal procedures. Clean up procedures must be supervised by a certified renovator.

Cleaning Verification

After the required cleanup activities have been performed, the certified renovator must verify the cleaning by matching a cleaning cloth with an EPA Cleaning Verification Card (CVC). If the cloth appears dirtier or darker than the card, the cleaning must be repeated following specific cleaning guidelines until it meets specific verification requirements.

Record Keeping

A complete file of records on the project must be kept by the Certified Firm, and certain records must be kept by the Certified Renovator if not an employee of the firm. These records must be kept for a minimum of three years. These records include, but aren’t limited to:

  1. Verification that the owner and or occupants have received the Renovate Right pamphlet or what attempts were made to provide the brochure
  2. Documentation of the scope of work
  3. Documentation of work practices used to complete the work
  4. Proof of valid certification of the Certified Renovator
  5. And, Proof of worker training in the required work practices

We know that record keeping is a royal pain, and we also know that if your filing cabinet gets stolen, or is burned in a fire, or is tampered withl, you may end up in big trouble. 

Enforcement and Inspections

The RRP Rule is primarily COMPLAINT DRIVEN. That means that the agency relies on homeowners, neighbors, residents and your competitors to let the FBI know when there is an apparent violation in progress. In addition, anyone can sue for enforcement and collect legal fees, so law firms will have a real financial incentive to advertise for LEAD POISONING cases. 

The EPA will use a variety of methods to determine whether businesses are complying with the RRP Rules. Pre-notification to ERA of work activities is not required and local building departments are not required to be involved in any way, although they likely will in time. The EPA may review, at any time, a firm’s required records, maintained for all renovation jobs the firm has done, for up to three years after the job has finished. The EPA may conduct work site inspections and can issue subpoenas to ensure compliance. Violations are investigated by the FBI. This is federal law, not a local ordinance.

Penalties of up to $32,500 per violation, per day can be assessed. Those committing willful or knowing violation of the rules can also be fined an additional $32,500 per violation or risk up to 5 years imprisonment, or both. EPA may suspend, revoke, or modify a Firm’s certification. Conditions of recertification are specific depending on why the firm lost it.You don’t want to risk it.

EPA will be responding to citizen tips and complaints. Contractors should be aware that record keeping will be a major enforcement tool used by the EPA. Renovators can contest EPA’s allegations and proposed penalty before an impartial judge or jury.

Exemptions to RRP Work Practices

The required work practices may be waived under the following conditions:

  • The home or child occupied facility was built after 1978.
  • The property is used as housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities, unless any child who is less than 6 years of age resides or is expected to reside in such housing
  • The property is a zero-bedroom dwelling, such as studio apartments or dormitories.
  • The renovations are performed by the home owner(s) themselves, without any paid help.
  • The renovations are performed without compensation (Examples might include friends, brother-in-law, or volunteers)
  • The repairs are truly minor in scope, with interior work disturbing less than six square feet of painted surfaces or exteriors disturbing less than 20 square feet of painted surfaces. The EPA has indicated that it intends for the word “disturb” to be interpreted BROADLY, rather than narrowly, so patching a nail hole would likely be considered a one square foot job.
  • The homeowner MAY NOT opt out of the required work practices by signing a waiver that there are no children under age six frequently visiting the property, no one in the home is pregnant, or the property is not a child-occupied facility. Contractors should be aware that EPA has removed the owner’s right to opt-out from the rule and required work practices.
  • The work practices do not apply if the entire house or specifically affected components, as described within a scope of work for the project, test lead free by a Certified Risk Assessor, Lead Inspector or Certified Renovator
  • In the case that renovations are for emergency or interim control purposes, the work practices do not apply. However, in these situations, the cleaning practices and cleaning verification are still required.

Business Considerations

Compliance with this rule and protection of your business will require rethinking existing business practices. Remodelers and others considered renovators under the RRP rule will need to identify what parts of the rule they can support using existing systems, what systems will need modification, what systems will need replacement, and, finally, what new systems will be required that do not already exist. Considerations can include your sales process, contracts and specifications, estimating, production management and methods, project scheduling and critical path, and employee selection just to name a few.

New business administration activities will also need to be considered. Creation, collection and storage of required documentation will be critical for rule compliance and to manage business liabilities. Occupant notification requirements and business recertification requirements are date specific and also require documentation. Effective use of technology will be a critical factor for ensuring compliance while at the same time controlling overhead costs. Businesses with a high dependency on people, rather than technology in these areas, face additional payroll costs and risk increased liabilities due to possible human error.


The New EPA RRP rules will be a game changer for many businesses that perform work that disturbs paint. the truth is that these rules are not all that different from what we are doing right now, but we’ll all have to use a lot more 6 mil plastic sheeting and duct tape and clean up better than we ever have before.  I’m not talking broom clean, or even shop vac clean.  I’m talking about the clean you expect when you take your car or truck in for detailing.

The days of waking up in the morning and finding out what Mrs. Jones wants you to do that day are pretty much over.  From now on, pre-job planning is going to be very important. Who you hire, how you manage them, and how you will produce your work will all be very different from the world you have been living in.

You can’t pretend not to know about or wait for this to go away. Smart business owners and managers can not only meet the requirements of the RRP rule now, but can also use these new requirements in a variety of ways to separate their businesses from the competition. This is a great opportunity to get ready, or, get out. It’s also a great time and reason to invest in or replace your workforce if you plan to stay.

This article published with permission by my good friend in Atlanta, John Adams.